Liebe Leserinnen und Leser,
unsere Online-Journals ziehen um. Die neuen (und alten) Ausgaben aller Zeitschriften finden Sie unter
In den meisten Fällen können Sie sich dort mit Ihrer E-Mail-Adresse und Ihrem bisherigen Passwort direkt einloggen. Ansonsten bitten wir Sie, sich erneut zu registrieren. Vielen Dank.
Ihr Quintessenz Verlag
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl) 10 (2017), Nr. 4 12. Dez. 2017
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl) 10 (2017), Nr. 4 (12.12.2017)
Seite 453-463, PubMed:29234752, Sprache: Englisch
Morphological and immunophenotypical differences between chronic periodontitis and peri-implantitis - a cross-sectional study
Galindo-Moreno, Pablo / López-Martínez, Jesús / Caba-Molina, Mercedes / Ríos-Pelegrina, Rosa / Torrecillas-Martínez, Laura / Monje, Alberto / Mesa, Francisco / Chueca, Natalia / García-García, Federico / O'Valle, Francisco
Purpose: To examine differences in morphology and in immunophenotype subsets between chronic periodontitis (CP) and peri-implantitis (P-I) lesions and to test the diagnostic agreement (CP vs P-I) among three independent observers, based on histopathological features.
Materials and methods: This observational cross-sectional study included 15 gingival biopsies of CP lesions and 15 biopsies of P-I lesions for double-blinded examination by three independent pathologists. Inflammatory infiltrate intensity was assessed semiquantitatively on a 4-point scale, determining the percentage of lymphocytes, plasma cells, monocytes/macrophages, and granulocytes and the presence/absence of bacterial colonies. Immunohistochemical analyses were performed to verify the inflammatory infiltrate subset data (CD45, CD38, CD68 and myeloperoxidase [MPO]-positive), and number of vessels. Kappa statistic was used to evaluate the degree of diagnostic concordance among examiners.
Results: Inflammatory infiltrate was significantly more severe in P-I cases (P = 0.01), which showed a significantly higher percentage of plasma cells (P = 0.004) than in CP cases. Immunohistochemically, the percentage of leukocyte subsets was generally lower in CP (CD38: 32.05%; CD68: 6.45% and MPO: 8.62%) than in P-I (CD38: 61.13%; CD68: 9.09% and MPO: 7.47%) (CD38 P = 0.001, P = 0.955 and P = 0.463, for remaining subsets, respectively; Mann-Whitney U-test). The inter-observer diagnostic agreement was poor or slight (kappa = -0.18 to 0.13).
Conclusions: Despite the significantly more severe general inflammatory infiltrate and plasma cells in P-I cases, it proved difficult to detect reliable differential morphological features based on histopathological images of these CP and P-I soft-tissue samples, obtaining low inter-observer and intra-observer diagnostic agreement.
Conflict of interest statement: This investigation was partially supported by Research Groups #CTS-138 and #CTS-583 (Junta de Andalucía, Spain). No conflict of interest.
Schlagwörter: chronic periodontitis, immunohistochemistry, pathology, peri-implantitis